It’s my favorite time of the year! Tournament of Books…
Welp. I began this post the first week of March with the title “So Begins the TOB” and since that was over two weeks ago, I wish I could say only that Time Sure Flies By. Wish I could say that I only got distracted.
But then the world turned upside down.
Sure, we can be grateful that the Tournament continues! No need to cancel any online gatherings for this joyful reading event. And it has been lovely, that the discussion has mostly focused on the books. I likely bet that the diversion has been most welcome.
So, why not? let’s talk books.
Q: Care, what are your favorites going in to this event? How are your brackets holding up?
A: Thank you for asking, but to be honest, I didn’t even fill out a bracket. I fill in a blank one as the decisions are cast. But that is neither here nor there. My favorites from this year’s slate are:
So the Mary is out and so is Your House. Hopes all hinge on the fire children now. Nothing to See Here zombies back to life; or rather has a chance. We have a few more rounds to get through before we see if NtSH truly makes it to the semi-finals.
I truly do NOT think I could stomach the stress and anxiety of being a judge! Yikes. I have really admired the thoughtful decisions this year (I probably say this every year).
Ok, let’s talk GWO and LCA: the latest round of heavyweights. I did not have a preference, having abandoned Lost Children Archive at the change of perspective because it was due back at the library. (And sadly, was not compelled* to try again at a later date.) I skimmed the last third of Girl, Woman, Other because I couldn’t keep anyone straight and was getting severely impatient wondering what and how it was coming together.
OK, here’s what I want to talk about and also an example of what a coward I am: a friend tweeted at me that they didn’t read GWO because, and I quote, “whooooooboy the author has problematic views on nonbinary people.” And I was dumbstruck. I did not know how to ask more or challenge or invite explanation. I could not and still don’t find any evidence that Everisto presented anything disrespectful or problematic, in fact, someone -only one! – praised the author for the representation.
I myself, do not have opinion/knowledge how nonbinary “should be or not” but hope to have an openness and discovery to learning more – and that’s where I don’t know what is or is NOT problematic, I mean, I can sense disrespect, of course, but I personally thought GWO was fabulous at presenting individuals living lives their own truthful way. Applause to that.
Whew. I wanted to bring it up in the TOB commentary but I’m not brave. (and am refraining from comments spurred by liquid courage.) Anyway.
Help me be a better ally and reader.
I love the TOB! NOW, let’s talk about Jade Chang, our judge from yesterday and her list of how to decide the worthy book:
- Is it a FAST read?
- Is it SURPRISING?
- Are the characters INTERESTING?
- Is it COZY (“…can just sail forward, knowing that I will reach an exciting port”)
- Is it about the WORLD RIGHT NOW?
- Did it make me FEEL SOMETHING LASTING?
Friends, this post must come to an end. Thanks for spending a few minutes with my words, questions and thoughts. Be safe out there, be kind; let’s get through this with calm resolve.
HAPPY WORLD POETRY DAY!!!!
* Having read all the debate discussion from Summer TOB, I felt I got enough of the second half to need not read it myself. #shrug