Thoughts   Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, Dover Publications 1994 (orig pub’d 1831), 166 pages  (or 9 CDs)

Genre:  Classic?   Horror?!    Challenge:  RIP V.

I was listening to the audio* of this but it was due back to the library before I made it even 2/3 of the way.   I returned it.   I was having trouble focusing on it anyway or I was laughing at all the “WRETCHEDNESS!!!”-esses so floweryly** expressed.

I still own the book so maybe, someday, I’ll pick it up again.   I have this funny feeling that in a class with the right teacher, this would be a fascinating look at ‘humanity.’

DNF = Did Not Finish.

* If you missed my bad poetry review that I wrote awhile back, you didn’t really miss anything.
** What?  Don’t like floweryly?   flowerily?  oh well.   It seems to be the best word I could invent that fit.


Copyright © 2010. Care’s Online Book Club. All rights reserved. This post was originally posted by Care from Care’s Online Book Club.  It should not be reproduced without express written permission.

20 thoughts on “Frankenstein

    1. Yes, it was a bit distracting! I would hear a phrase like ‘the astonishment which I had first experienced gave place to delight and rapture’ and I would think to myself, ‘delight and rapture?!’ and then miss the next 5 minutes rethinking the phrase…

  1. I might not have read if if I hadn´t been a teacher, but as it is, I found several aspects to like, e.g. the theme of men playing Gods (or women?) by giving life to a creature😀

    1. I must say that if I had realized it was intended as some kind of morality tale rather than an entertaining monster story, I probably would have been more ready for it. I started so confused. And as Kathy the BermudaOnion says, reading this is probably better than listening. Listening might be better as a RE-read.

  2. When I tried to read this I found it was too different from the popular culture notions of Frankenstein for me to get into it- it just wasn’t what I expected. Oh well!🙂

  3. Sorry you didn’t make it through. I really enjoyed Frankenstein, but then again, I DID read it with a class and that might have made all the difference in the world.

    1. Amanda, I do think I came into it with the WRONG expectations. I can see why it is a classic and maybe now that I know it isn’t just an entertaining monster story, I could be compelled to try it again. Maybe annotated next time?

  4. Well, I for one, will not argue with your decision to not renew it. I still have to say that I’m glad you started it though–’cause I still love your poem!😀

  5. When I read this last year for Dueling Monsters, I got a copy that had the two versions of Frankenstein…the earlier version was written by Mary Shelley herself; and then the second edition was edited and influenced by her husband Percy Bysshe Shelley. He should have left it alone — it’s more flowery than the original was!

    1. Valerie! I can’t find any ref to whether or not mine was the edited and enhanced(?) version or the orig. VERY interesting. I’m glad I own the book – and I love the cover. Maybe someday I will really sit and read the whole thing. I was amazed how long it was for a 160 page book.

Welcome! I invite you to comment. If for some reason commenting is troublesome, pls send email to BkClubCare [at] Gmail

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s